New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday steered clear of the political talk about it having made an exception for Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in granting him interim bail for campaigning in the Lok Sabha polls but said “critical analysis of the judgement is welcome”.
“It is his assumption, we cannot say anything,” the bench told Mehta.
Mehta alleged that Kejriwal had violated the bail condition by his assertion.
Justice Khanna said the court’s order is clear that he has to surrender on June 2.
“We have not said anything in the order that he cannot speak about the case,” the bench said.
Without naming Home Minister Amit Shah, senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, who was appearing for Kejriwal, referred to an interview where he said many believe the court accorded “special treatment” to the AAP leader.
The bench told Singhvi it will not go into that.
The senior lawyer denied that Kejriwal had made any statement about having to go back to jail if people did not vote for his party. Singhvi said he can swear an affidavit to that effect.
The top court was hearing Kejriwal’s plea against his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate in a money laundering case stemming from the alleged excise scam.
On May 10, the apex court had granted Kejriwal interim bail till June 1, the last day of the seven-phase Lok Sabha elections, and directed him to surrender and go back to jail on June 2.
The Delhi chief minister was arrested on March 21.
The court had, however, barred Kejriwal from visiting his office or the Delhi secretariat, and signing official files unless absolutely necessary for obtaining the lieutenant governor’s approval.
The matter relates to alleged corruption and money laundering in the formulation and execution of the Delhi government’s now-scrapped excise policy for 2021-22